Friday 20 May 2016

Practical applications of Excellence Knowledge


Last time I wrote generally about performance excellence in corporate world. This one is generally about the applicability of that knowledge by presenting some examples in context of the unique knowledge sourced from the analysis and employee development. In the next text, I'll discuss the potential benefits of such analysis in recruitment practice as it is not only the results, but also the methodological approach that can be utilized.

Unique knowledge

By obtaining vast amount knowledge of the demands required to excel in a specific position in your company, you'll improve and create a more rounded and holistic view overall. You already know that to excel, lets say, as a financial consultant it takes certain skills and abilities to do well, but still when you compare two consultants with exact same skillset – one outperforms the other.

Now that this is all hypothetical, it may be that is due to the attentional capacity and focus or that the other copes better with the given situation. It can be something else, but these determinants of excellence are undetectable from a resume. They can be detected by asking right questions and analyzing was said.

Bearing in mind that these characteristics and determinants vary depending on the position. You will gain a thorough understanding of the positional demands in your company – not only knowing the hard skills needed to succeed, but also so the softer attributes required to excel. In other words, you'll create an understanding of what makes your company and where to go next.

Employee development and engagement

With the fundamental knowledge you can then lead your company to achieve excellence by developing your employees as a team or individual and reorganizing the company where deemed appropriate. With the knowledge you have, you can profile your employees and thereby take the correct actions to achieve results.

You can develop your employees as a team and as individual by creating training programmes for them to achieve mutually agreed goals. The individual may sound as taxing and consuming task, but it has the greatest potential. Because when you treat people as a individual (assuming that you mean it really), people feel special and wanted. That positive feeling can lead to determination, passion, commitment and engagement, which are all positively associated with the level of performance. When you add that input to the training program's potential benefits, the results may be overwhelming.

The reorganization refers to the position specific analysis and the profile of an individual employee. Often a certain set of hard skills can be fit for various jobs within the company so that they could work in many positions with an induction. Now, let's pick an average sales person and study her/his profile and we find that his is a perfect match to those deemed most successful in, for example, advisory services.

You can now weigh your options. You can develop the person to improve their sales performance or reorganize, if possible. At least the conversation would be positive and easy as you'd told them how good they could be in the exemplary advisory role. There is great chance for discovering potential with the side bonus of more committed and engaged employee as, once again, the manager showed their interest in them on a highly individual level.



Thursday 12 May 2016

Performance Excellence in Corporate World




This text is hypothetical and I'm only aiming to generate thoughts and discussion. So at first I'm gonna create a hypothetical situation and make gross assumptions to make a clear example.

Lets assume that you have 1000 employees in your e.g. sales department and those 1000 employees fit the normal distribution, when it comes to the sales performance and revenue creation. There you have the elite percentile, average and below average. On fundamental basis they all have same education and thus, same set of skills and should be able to produce equal performance. Already here, one can conclude that the main thing separating them is their personality and characteristics.

Now, there is a way to create an understanding of what distinguishes the best performing population from others. In other words, what makes and creates the best? Wouldn't it be nice to have that knowledge in your hands?

That knowledge could become a multifaceted asset for company and yield growth in many ways. First and foremost, you could create a unique understanding of your workforce and the potential you have in your hands. Then, there could be designed solutions to promote and develop those desired characteristics associated with top performers to improve the overall and individual performance. It could also assist and aid the recruitment process by providing insight of the personality characteristics essential for performance excellence in the job. Furthermore, in organizational change an understanding of the employees could also have an advantage.

It is also worth noting that investing in individuals' intellectual capital will most certainly have an influence on their commitment, motivation and satisfaction in their jobs, which in turn is shown to have a positive effect to the growth of your company.

Would you be happy, if you could, for example, discover more of your current potential and recruit with greater accuracy among other possible benefits?


If you'd want to know more or have any comment and/or questions, I'd be more than happy to have a conversation.

Wednesday 11 May 2016

Just a thought on mechanical doping

Those of you who know me also know that I'm all for pure sport without doping, cheating and corruption. You may also know that I'm pretty black and white as a person when it comes to that. But now I'm facing a dilemma, which I'm gonna try to express in words.

Once the news came of the mechanical doping case in cyclocross, it all broke loose when it came to that topic. The girl got punished and fined – rightly so. Now they're driving penalties for the support entourage too. Something just bothers me, so here we go. I understand the seriousness and novelty of this case, but still I can't quite get my head around this. Lets make hypothetical scenario with exaggerations at places.

A rider with or without their support crew decide upon placing a hidden motor inside a bike to boost the performance. The motor provides ”a good few watts in bursts”, when the motor is on. On the other hand, the motor acts as excess weight when the batteries are drained or the motor is off. Yet, the rider still has to do the training without motor. Luckily, the respective rider is caught.

Simultaneously, a rider with or without their support crew decide upon injecting EPO to boost the performance. The steady dosing of EPO provides the athlete with steady excess reserve of ”a good few watts” for the whole duration of the race, for the whole duration of their training and it has the potential to aid their recovery. Luckily again, the rider is caught.

Then I start to get confused.

First, people reacted with hostility towards the motor and as a way of cheating held it more severe violation than the exemplary case of  EPO or other substance for that matter. Then comes the penalties, which are the standard two years for the glowing EPO sample and six year for the mechanical cheat, and the fine of 20.000 euros. With my math there is a four year and 20k difference for cheating, which is bewildering with EPO being potentially more beneficial.

What is there to create such difference, when EPO can provide you potentially better gains? Both are frauds and totally unacceptable, but are they really so different? And why so? Because, to me they aren't.